What is rollup?
Rollup is a module bundler for JavaScript which compiles small pieces of code into something larger and more complex, such as a library or application. It is optimized for bundling JavaScript files to use in a browser, and it is also capable of transforming code using plugins.
What are rollup's main functionalities?
Bundling Modules
Rollup can bundle multiple JavaScript modules into a single file. The above code demonstrates how to create a bundle from an entry point file 'src/main.js' and output it as an immediately-invoked function expression (IIFE) to 'bundle.js'.
import rollup from 'rollup';
async function build() {
const bundle = await rollup.rollup({
input: 'src/main.js'
});
await bundle.write({
file: 'bundle.js',
format: 'iife',
name: 'MyModule'
});
}
build();
Tree-shaking
Rollup includes a feature called 'tree-shaking' which removes unused code from the final bundle. This helps in reducing the size of the bundle and improving load times.
import { rollup } from 'rollup';
rollup({
input: 'src/index.js',
treeshake: true // Tree-shaking is enabled by default
}).then(bundle => {
// Code to write the bundle
});
Plugin System
Rollup supports a wide range of plugins that can transform the code, add functionality, or integrate with other build tools. The code sample shows how to use the JSON plugin to import JSON files as modules.
import { rollup } from 'rollup';
import json from '@rollup/plugin-json';
rollup({
input: 'src/index.js',
plugins: [json()]
}).then(bundle => {
// Code to write the bundle
});
Other packages similar to rollup
webpack
Webpack is a powerful module bundler that can handle not only JavaScript but also assets like images, fonts, and stylesheets. It has a larger ecosystem and more configuration options compared to Rollup, making it more suitable for complex applications.
parcel
Parcel is a web application bundler that offers a zero-configuration experience. It is known for its fast build times and out-of-the-box support for various file types. Parcel is easier to set up than Rollup and Webpack but may offer less fine-grained control.
browserify
Browserify allows you to use `require('modules')` in the browser by bundling up all of your dependencies. It is one of the earlier bundlers and is focused on simplicity and ease of use, but it doesn't have built-in tree-shaking like Rollup.
Rollup
I roll up, I roll up, I roll up, Shawty I roll up
I roll up, I roll up, I roll up
–Wiz Khalifa
Quickstart
Rollup can be used via a JavaScript API or a Command Line Interface. Install with npm install -g rollup
and run rollup --help
to get started.
Dive into the wiki when you're ready to learn more about Rollup and ES6 modules.
A next-generation ES6 module bundler
When you're developing software, it's much easier to break your library or application apart into separate pieces that you can work on separately. It's also very likely that you'll have dependencies on third party libraries. The result is lots of small files – but that's bad news for browsers, which get slowed down by having to make many requests. (It's also bad news for Node!)
The solution is to write your code as modules, and use a module bundler to concatenate everything into a single file. Browserify and Webpack are examples of module bundlers.
So far, so good, but there's a problem. When you include a library in your bundle...
var utils = require( 'utils' );
var query = 'Rollup';
utils.ajax( 'https://api.example.com?search=' + query ).then( handleResponse );
...you include the whole library, including lots of code you're not actually using.
ES6 modules solve this problem. Instead of importing the whole of utils
, we can just import the ajax
function we need:
import { ajax } from 'utils';
var query = 'Rollup';
ajax( 'https://api.example.com?search=' + query ).then( handleResponse );
Rollup statically analyses your code, and your dependencies, and includes the bare minimum in your bundle.
Shouldn't we be writing those utilities as small modules anyway?
Not always, no.
Don't minifiers already do this?
If you minify code with something like UglifyJS (and you should!) then some unused code will be removed:
(function () {
function foo () {
console.log( 'this function was included!' );
}
function bar () {
console.log( 'this function was not' );
baz();
}
function baz () {
console.log( 'neither was this' );
}
foo();
})();
A minifier can detect that foo
gets called, but that bar
doesn't. When we remove bar
, it turns out that we can also remove baz
.
But because of the limitations of static analysis, and the dynamic nature of JavaScript, it can't do the same thing with code like this:
(function () {
var obj = {
foo: function () {
console.log( 'this method was included!' );
},
bar: function () {
console.log( 'so was this :-(' );
this.baz();
},
baz: function () {
console.log( 'and this :-(' );
}
};
obj.foo();
})();
Unfortunately, traditional modules – CommonJS and AMD – result in code more like the second example than the first, making them next-to-impossible to optimise. Rather than excluding dead code, we should be including live code (aka 'tree-shaking'). That's only possible with ES6 modules.
Can I use it with my non-ES6 dependencies?
Yes! Rollup can't work its tree-shaking magic on CommonJS modules, but it can convert them to ES6 via plugins.
Can I distribute my package as an ES6 module?
If your package.json
has a jsnext:main
field, ES6-aware tools like Rollup can import the ES6 version of the package instead of the legacy CommonJS or UMD version. You'll be writing your code in a more future-proof way, and helping to bring an end to the dark days of JavaScript package management. Learn more here.
See rollup-starter-project for inspiration on how to get started.
How does this compare to JSPM/SystemJS?
JSPM is awesome, and it uses Rollup in its builder! In addition to bundling modules, it also combines a repository with a package manager and a client-side module loader. JSPM allows you to use any module format and even develop without a build step, so it's a great choice for creating applications. Stand-alone Rollup doesn't use the complex SystemJS format, making it a better choice for creating libraries.
License
Released under the MIT license.